Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is well-structured and mostly executable, with concrete prompts and model IDs plus a sensible curl fallback. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: there are no validation/verification checkpoints after generation, capping that dimension at 3.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint after Phase A and Phase B (e.g., confirm the generated image shows both the user and actor in 9:16 before offering the next step) to raise workflow_clarity above 3.
Provide the actual full `muapi image edit ...` and image-to-video CLI invocations (with flags) rather than describing the call as a plan step, to make actionability copy-paste ready.
Trim the bold restatement of the description directly under the H1 to save tokens without losing information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is reasonably lean: a tight inputs table, two phased steps with concrete prompts, and a short notes section; only minor padding (the bold restatement of the description) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete model IDs, exact prompt strings, reference-image wiring, and a curl fallback with polling, but the image-edit/video commands are described as plan steps rather than fully copy-paste muapi CLI invocations. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases A and B are sequenced with clear gating ('Only when requested', 'If not provided, ask'), but there is no verification/feedback checkpoint after image or video generation to confirm output quality before proceeding. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Inputs, Steps, Trigger Keywords, Notes) with no nested references and everything inline at one level; it is a compact single-file skill that needs no bundle, so structure is good with only minor room to externalize the long prompt templates. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |