Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and efficient, with concrete muapi commands and a sensible two-step workflow. The main weaknesses are minor: a duplicated intro line and the lack of an explicit image-generation failure/retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, avoiding concept over-explanation; the duplicated intro sentence that restates the description and the standalone Trigger Keywords list are minor tokens that could be trimmed, keeping it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete `muapi image generate`/`edit` invocations with model IDs, aspect ratios, and copy-ready prompts, plus a curl fallback and `muapi predict wait`; minor gaps (the curl body shown as `{...}` and no full CLI flag syntax) keep it from a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phase A lays out two clearly sequenced parallel steps with checkpoints for auth configuration and unreachable-URL fallback; the operation is non-destructive so the cap-3 rule does not apply, but the absence of a generation-failure recovery loop is a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a self-contained ~52-line skill with well-organized sections (Inputs, Steps, Notes, Trigger Keywords, Executing-Agent notes) and no nested or external file references, matching the rubric's simple-skill allowance for a 5 on well-organized structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |