Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally tight, instruction-only skill: a complete executable submission template, an unambiguous status-to-terminal mapping, an explicit rework feedback loop, and firm boundaries — every token is load-bearing. The only meaningful gap is that the promised 'bounded' chain is never quantified, which leaves the workflow one notch below fully airtight.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative throughout — no concept explanations, no padding, every line instructs. Even the guardrail sentences ("It is not an environment variable and must not be inferred"; "do not rely on the Reviewer's remembered role instructions alone") earn their tokens by preventing concrete failure modes. This matches the anchor 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | A fully executable `command ask --chain --artifact-reply` heredoc template with every payload field itemized, the exact four-value machine-line status enum, explicit placeholder-substitution rules, and a copy-paste-ready continuation branch per status. The only unfilled parts are inherent placeholders (`<ref>`, `<node id>`, `<assigned-reviewer>`), which the skill explicitly tells the reader to fill. Matches the 'copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear (implement and verify → submit exactly once → stop → branch on status) with an explicit feedback loop (rework: apply only the requested repair, rerun verification, re-ask the same Reviewer) and terminal-status mapping. Falls short of 5 because 'bounded' is never quantified — no hop limit or convergence rule beyond the non_converged escape hatch — leaving 'exactly once per bounded review hop' with an implicit bound. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A ~60-line single-topic skill with no external reference needs and no bundle files; the Submit / Continuation / Boundaries sections are well-organized and the command block is appropriately inline as core content. Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |