Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An extremely lean, fully actionable single-purpose skill with excellent conciseness and structure. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation/verification step for a batch operation that clears all agent contexts, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step after the command, e.g. confirm the reported output indicates contexts were cleared before stopping, to satisfy the validation requirement for batch/destructive operations.
Optionally note how to verify which agents were affected when the bare command is used, so the result of the batch clear is checked rather than just reported.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (three command variants, scope note, boundary constraints) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Three fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases (all agents, single agent via variable, multiple named agents), matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is unambiguous (run one command, report output, stop), but the bare command clears all agent contexts — a batch/destructive operation — with no explicit validation checkpoint, so the rubric's destructive/batch cap at 3 applies despite the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (commands, scope, constraints), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |