Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable runbook that assumes competence and includes a bounded-repair plus re-check feedback loop, satisfying the destructive-operation validation requirement. Only minor: the workflow could be made slightly more explicit with numbered steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no padding: it assumes Claude's competence and never explains what CCB or tmux is; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands (ccb ping/ps/queue/pend/trace/doctor logs) with a concrete $AGENT variable covering the common diagnostic cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (authority commands -> trace/logs evidence -> bounded repair -> re-check) with an explicit validation checkpoint ("re-check the same runtime and lineage evidence"), though steps are prose rather than a numbered checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no need for external references; the single H1 and grouped command block are well-organized enough to score 5 per the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |