Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured boundary reference that tells the provider exactly what not to touch and precisely how to reply, with no wasted tokens. It fully satisfies the rubric for a simple instruction-only skill across conciseness, actionability, workflow clarity, and organization.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven with no filler and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; it assumes competence and every line carries domain-specific information (boundary rules, reply shape), matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance: explicit prohibitions ('Do not add, hide, park, resume, remove, release, or inspect agents') and a precise reply checklist (role/reason, blockers, readiness, citations); per the scoring notes, the absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill whose single action — 'reply with semantic evidence only' with a defined component list — is unambiguous, satisfying the simple-skill allowance that workflow clarity can score 3 when the action is clear; the Provider Boundary and Reply Shape sections sequence the constraint then the response format. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references (none of references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist); per the rubric note, well-organized sections alone warrant a 3, and the Provider Boundary and Reply Shape headers provide clear structure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |