planner-closure-backfill

Produce one revision-fenced Planner backfill proposal for either a Detailer replan or task-set closure, with compact Frontdesk status evidence.

Quality

50%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/plantree/plans/agentic-loop-workflow/drafts/agentroles.ccb_planner/skills/planner-closure-backfill/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with exact JSON contracts and mappings, but it is verbose with redundant restatements and references template files that are absent from the bundle. Workflow clarity is adequate for a single-action contract but lacks internal validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Dedupe the repeated no-side-effect constraints into a single 'No side effects' rule to improve conciseness.

Either provide the referenced templates/planner-backfill*.json files as bundle assets or remove the dangling references and keep the inline exemplar as the single source of truth.

Consolidate the scattered copy-exactly rules into one checklist so the workflow reads as a sequenced procedure rather than a rule list.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it restates the no-side-effect constraint three times ('Do not run shell commands...', 'No PlanTree write, Frontdesk notification, CCB command...', 'Do not modify PlanTree or send Frontdesk messages...') and repeats several copy-exactly rules, so it could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	It supplies complete copy-paste-ready JSON exemplars with exact field names, an explicit enum mapping ('pass -> closure_complete', etc.), and precise per-field copy/transform rules, giving fully actionable guidance for a contract skill.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The skill is a single reply-only action with clear sections, but it is organized as rules rather than a sequenced multi-step workflow, and all validation is externalized to the host with no explicit internal checkpoint beyond the revision_conflict rule.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The single file is well-sectioned but exceeds 50 lines and references 'templates/planner-backfill-detailer-replan.json' and 'templates/planner-backfill.json' that do not exist in the bundle, leaving dangling, non-navigable references.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

35%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a precise niche and the core action, but leans on internal jargon that users would not naturally say and lacks an explicit 'Use when' trigger. Specificity and distinctiveness are moderate rather than strong due to the single-action framing and sibling-skill overlap.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause stating the natural trigger conditions (e.g., when the controller activation is a Detailer replan or task-set closure) to lift completeness.

Soften the internal jargon with at least one user-recognizable term so trigger_term_quality reflects language a user would actually say.

Sharpen distinctiveness by contrasting the skill's role against the sibling planner-task-packet intake skill in the description.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	It names the domain and a concrete action ('Produce one revision-fenced Planner backfill proposal') plus the 'Frontdesk status evidence' attribute, but does not list multiple distinct concrete actions; the verbs are largely one produce-action wrapped in system jargon.	2 / 3
Completeness	The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger; the 'for either a Detailer replan or task-set closure' clause only implies the condition, so per the guidelines completeness is capped at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	The terms 'Planner backfill', 'Detailer replan', 'task-set closure', and 'Frontdesk status' are internal-system jargon rather than natural keywords a user would say, matching the technical-jargon anchor rather than natural user language.	1 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It carves a specific niche, but the jargon overlaps with a sibling skill (the body notes intake is owned by 'planner-task-packet') and the mode terms could be confused with that related skill, so it is not clearly conflict-free.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: SeemSeam/claude_codex_bridge
Path: docs/plantree/plans/agentic-loop-workflow/drafts/agentroles.ccb_planner/skills/planner-closure-backfill/SKILL.md
Commit: ec3de76

Reviewed: about 10 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.