Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, operationally precise instruction set: sequenced workflow, exact output contract, enumerated legal states, and a clear boundary list. Its only real weaknesses are minor redundancy in the boundaries and the absence of a small example (manifest JSON, replan request) that would remove the last execution ambiguity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no known concepts are explained and every workflow step carries operational content. It falls short of 5 only because the Boundaries section repeats itself ('Do not dispatch runtime agents' vs 'Never dispatch workers or submit downstream asks', and two overlapping 'do not run ccb commands' bullets). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete: exact artifact filenames, the schema string 'ccb.detail_packet_manifest.v1', enumerated result labels and legal tuples, and the exact replan handoff 'ccb.detailer.replan_request.v1'. It misses 5 because no example manifest JSON or replan-request shape is shown, leaving minor execution ambiguity. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit classification decision point and a manifest field contract. Validation checkpoints are mostly implicit (there is no 'verify the tuple is legal before returning' step), which keeps it below anchor 5, but the sequence and error/replan paths are otherwise complete. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, self-contained with no external references needed, and organized into clean 'Workflow' and 'Boundaries' sections; per the rubric guideline this earns a 5. No bundle files exist, so there are no dangling references to verify. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |