Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of progressive disclosure — a concise overview mapping tasks to nine well-labeled reference files plus a compact code quick-reference. The main gap is actionability: the inline code is a labeled skeleton with placeholders rather than a copy-paste-runnable common case.
Suggestions
Add one small fully-resolved executable example in the Quick Reference (e.g., a complete minimal server.tool with a real schema and a minimal widget rendering props) so the common case is copy-paste ready, not a skeleton.
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint in the Implementation flow (e.g., "run dev server and confirm the widget appears in ChatGPT before extending") to turn the phased sequence into a workflow with feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: no padding, no explaining what React/TypeScript/MCP are, just an orientation note, task-to-reference mappings with when-to-use triggers, and a tight code skeleton. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The Quick Reference gives real executable TypeScript (server.tool + widget scaffolding with actual imports) but uses ... placeholders (z.object({...}), props: {...}) and delegates the fully runnable detail to reference files — mostly executable with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear phased build lifecycle (Before You Code → Setup → Implementation) sequences the work, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or validate→fix→retry feedback loops, only implicit ones. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references: each of the 9 links carries a what-it-covers label and a when-to-use trigger, all referenced files exist, and content is split by concern for easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |