Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is commendably concise and offers specific interview directives, but it functions as a guideline list rather than a sequenced workflow, and its referenced resource files do not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Provide the referenced files (javascript.md, react-vue.md, browser.md) or remove the dead references so progressive disclosure resolves correctly.
Add 1–2 concrete example questions or a question template to make the guidance copy-paste ready and raise actionability.
Reframe the numbered guidelines into a sequenced interview flow with checkpoints (e.g. warm-up → deep-dive → metrics → edge cases) to improve workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~20 lines) with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is direct guidance, fitting 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is specific and includes concrete metrics (FCP/LCP、错误率、包体积) and topics, but it directs the interviewer's behavior without providing ready-to-use example questions or templates, fitting 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered items are guidelines rather than a sequenced workflow, and there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops; this fits 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It signals one-level-deep categorized references (javascript.md, react-vue.md, browser.md), but those referenced files are not present in the bundle, so navigation is broken; this fits 'references present but not clearly signaled / could be better organized'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |