Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured interview-conducting skill with concrete, example-backed guidance and a clear numbered workflow. Its main weakness is that the referenced resource files are not actually bundled, breaking the otherwise-good progressive-disclosure navigation.
Suggestions
Add the referenced files (test-development.md, java.md, python-basic.md) under references/ so the Additional Resources links resolve, or inline the essential content and drop dead references.
Convert the resource map to markdown links (e.g. [test-development.md](references/test-development.md)) so the navigation is verifiable and clickable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a short persona line plus five numbered directives and a categorized resource map — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Directives are concrete with specific examples ("追问实际落地细节:覆盖率数据、脚本维护成本、CI 集成方式"; "针对具体功能(如登录/支付/电商直播间)现场设计测试用例"); for an instruction-only skill this is actionable guidance, so the absence of code is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill under 50 lines with a clear numbered sequence; it involves no destructive or batch operations that would require validation feedback loops, so the sequence qualifies for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The Additional Resources section is well-signaled and one-level-deep with a category→file mapping, but the referenced files (test-development.md, java.md, python-basic.md) are not present in the bundle (no references/ directory), so navigation is broken, which holds this below a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |