Content
87%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured skill that efficiently communicates Obsidian vault conventions and provides executable commands for common operations. Its main weakness is the lack of validation steps in the create workflow—there's no verification that links resolve correctly or that index notes are updated. Overall, it's a strong example of a concise, actionable skill.
Suggestions
Add a validation step to the 'Create a new note' workflow to verify that wikilinks resolve to existing notes (e.g., a grep check for each linked note's existence).
Add guidance on updating relevant index notes when creating a new note, with a verification step to confirm the index was updated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line serves a purpose. No unnecessary explanations of what Obsidian is, what wikilinks are conceptually, or how bash works. The vault path, conventions, and commands are stated directly without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands for searching by filename, content, and backlinks. The create workflow gives concrete steps with specific conventions. Commands are copy-paste ready with actual vault paths. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Workflows are clearly listed and sequenced, but the 'Create a new note' workflow lacks a validation step—there's no check that wikilinks resolve to existing notes or that the note was properly added to a relevant index. For a vault management skill, verifying link integrity would be important. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references. Content is well-organized into clear sections (location, naming, linking, workflows) with logical grouping. No bundle files are needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |