Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally lean, well-structured protocol skill with explicit blocking gates and validation feedback loops. Its only weakness is reliance on an external task file for the concrete procedural steps.
Suggestions
Inline a one-line summary of the key procedural step from po-close-story.md so the body is self-sufficient for the most common case.
Clarify how the HALT state is reported back to the user (e.g., the exact message or exit condition) to make the feedback loop fully actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — terse gate conditions, no concept explanations, and every line earning its place, matching the lean skill ideal. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete gates (PASS/CONCERNS/WAIVED, File List present) and a real task path are actionable, but the actual procedural steps are delegated to the external `po-close-story.md` rather than given inline, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced Protocol with explicit blocking pre-close gates, a HALT feedback loop on hard fail, and a post-phase verification checklist — the destructive/admin operation has explicit validation checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one clearly-signaled one-level-deep external reference (Task SOT file) and no nested or buried references; appropriate for a lean single-purpose skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |