Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, well-structured instruction-only skill content with concrete gates and a verification checklist. The only notable gap is that the main execution detail lives in an external task file and the gate-failure retry loop is implied rather than explicit.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after the quality gates (e.g., 'If lint/typecheck/test fail: fix and re-run until green before marking tasks [x]') to make the retry path unambiguous.
Briefly note what the develop task file covers (one line) so the reader can gauge whether to load it before committing to the protocol.
Confirm the referenced task path '.aiox-core/development/tasks/dev-develop-story.md' is bundled or resolvable; if it lives outside the skill, surface that dependency explicitly.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place ('REUSE > ADAPT > CREATE', 'Local commits only. Push → @devops'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance for branch naming, quality gates, and edit allowlists, but the core execution is delegated to an external task file not shown here. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with quality gates and a verification checklist, but the gate-failure feedback loop (run → fix → rerun) is implicit rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections under 50 lines with a single clearly-signaled one-level reference to the task source-of-truth file; no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |