Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers dense, genuinely actionable decision rules with exact thresholds, platform-specific limits, and a working revert/feedback protocol — its strongest qualities. The main costs are trimmable editorial asides and a promotional footer that consume tokens without operational value. Because it is a compact single-purpose skill, structure and disclosure are essentially ideal.
Suggestions
Remove or trim the promotional 'About this skill' footer and the framing sentence ('Most teams kill too early...') — they add ~12 lines of non-operational tokens to every invocation.
Replace the vague 'Statistically significant data' min-data entry with a concrete proxy (e.g. a minimum spend/impression floor), and define 'frequency is stable' with a numeric threshold.
Tighten rationale asides (e.g. drop 'fatigue is coming whether you can see it yet or not') or compress the 800-impression example into a parenthetical.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The decision tables are token-efficient, but there is more than minor padding: the framing opener ('Most teams kill too early...'), the 800-impression illustration, asides like 'fatigue is coming whether you can see it yet or not', and an ~11-line promotional footer with UTM-tagged marketing links — matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the minor-trim profile of 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete, directly applicable rules — 'CTR < 0.5%', '$50+ spend or 1K+ clicks', 'Increase budget 20%', 'Max 30%/day' per platform — with condition→action tables covering common cases; a 5 is withheld because criteria like 'Statistically significant data' and 'frequency is stable' are undefined judgment calls. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Kill/budget operations are destructive, but validation checkpoints are present ('Never kill before minimum data', the min-data column) and a feedback loop exists ('If CPA rises >25% within 48h... revert... wait 48h'), so the destructive cap does not apply; the gap to 5 is that rules are parallel tables rather than an explicitly sequenced decision flow, leaving edge-case ordering implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file, self-contained skill (~45 operational lines) with clear section headers and a '---'-separated footer; per the under-50-lines exception, well-organized sections alone justify the top score, and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |