Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a genuinely actionable, well-sequenced workflow with concrete paths, formats, and approval gates — strong for an instruction-only skill. Its main weaknesses are the off-topic promotional footer that wastes context and the undefined MISMATCH recovery path, which keep conciseness and workflow clarity below the top anchors.
Suggestions
Remove the "About this skill" promotional footer (or relocate it out of SKILL.md) — it consumes tokens with no operational value.
Add a MISMATCH recovery step, e.g. "If MISMATCH: document the discrepancy, fix the code or update the spec, and re-verify before staging".
Replace placeholder questions ("What should happen when X?") with one concrete worked example per question group.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The workflow steps are tight ("If ANY box is unchecked, ask clarifying questions before proceeding"), but the trailing "About this skill" section ("Want this skill (and 40+ more) running on autopilot against your live ad accounts? Try Synter...") is roughly 8 lines of pure promotional padding unrelated to execution — more than the 'minor' trimmable excess of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: exact paths ("docs/specs/history/prs/YYYY-MM/PR-<number>.md"), a defined entry format ("BHV-AREA-NNN" with area codes), explicit status transitions ("UNVERIFIED → MATCH or MISMATCH"), and a literal script for the "just do it" case. Not a 5 because clarifying-question examples are placeholders ("What should happen when X?") and the spec template contents are never shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with real checkpoints: the ambiguity checklist, "Wait for explicit approval before writing code", and the Step 7 verification loop (UNVERIFIED → MATCH or MISMATCH) with test evidence. Not a 5 because the error-recovery loop is incomplete — nothing instructs what to do when an entry lands on MISMATCH. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized by step and every referenced path (templates, diagrams, ledger) is one level deep with no nesting; no bundle files exist, so this is scored on structure alone. Not a 5: the 8-item inline diagram catalog and the promotional footer are content that is not optimally placed, and at ~90 lines the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |