Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-organized overview that tells Claude what to research and how to present findings, without a wasted token. Its weakness is executability: the workflow's pivotal step (pulling advertising intelligence) names SpyFu but gives no concrete command, tool call, or data-fetching procedure, and there are no validation checkpoints. Adding concrete invocation examples for the data-gathering step would lift both actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples of the data-gathering step — e.g., the specific SpyFu tool calls, commands, or API requests for keyword gaps, ad history, and budget estimates — so 'Pull advertising intelligence data' becomes copy-paste actionable.
Expand the workflow steps to map each step to a specific capability and data source (e.g., step 2 -> SpyFu keyword gap + budget endpoints), replacing generic directions like 'Analyze keyword overlaps and gaps'.
Include a lightweight validation checkpoint, such as confirming the competitor domain is correct and the returned data is non-empty before summarizing, to close the workflow's missing-checkpoint gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows: a one-line role statement, seven terse capability bullets, a five-step workflow, and a four-item output format. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Capabilities name concrete analyses ("Compare the user's domain against competitors", "estimated monthly spend") and the Output Format specifies deliverables, but the execution path is absent — "Pull advertising intelligence data" never says how, and SpyFu is mentioned once with no commands, tool invocations, or API examples. Between anchors 2 and 3: some concrete guidance but missing the key details needed to execute. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five workflow steps are clearly sequenced but remain high-level ("Pull advertising intelligence data", "Analyze keyword overlaps and gaps") with no checkpoints and no indication of which data source or operation fulfills each step. Matches anchor 3 (sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit) rather than 4, whose steps embed concrete commands. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~34 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, yet is cleanly organized into Capabilities, Workflow, and Output Format sections. Per the rubric guideline for simple skills under 50 lines, this warrants a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |