Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced instruction-only skill that assumes Claude's competence and supplies genuinely non-obvious operational knowledge (tool names, approval policy, categorization heuristics, guardrail rules). The main gaps are the unnamed "plan tools" for the core write action and the absence of an explicit remediation loop after the post-change verification re-pull.
Suggestions
Name the specific plan tools used to apply negatives in section 4, just as the read steps name list_connected_accounts and pull_google_ads_performance, so the write step is fully executable.
Add a brief feedback loop after the verification re-pull (e.g., what to do if the same wasteful terms still serve — tighten match types, escalate to shared lists, or re-check cross-campaign conflicts).
Specify how soon to re-pull the search-term report and what spend/conversion threshold counts as "waste stopped", making the verification checkpoint concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is lean and operational: every section carries non-obvious information (tool names, the approval policy, a four-way categorization scheme, level-selection guidance) with essentially no padding beyond one orienting opening sentence. This matches the anchor for lean, efficient content where every token earns its place, rather than anchor 4's "minor instances of over-explanation". | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Read steps name concrete tools ("list_connected_accounts", "research_campaign_opportunity", "pull_google_ads_performance") and the categorization gives per-category actions, but the core write step — "Apply negatives through the plan tools" — does not name the specific tools, unlike the read steps. This is mostly executable guidance with a minor gap, matching anchor 4 rather than the fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (read → categorize → choose level → add on approval) with an approval checkpoint before the change and a verification step ("Re-pull the search-term report after a few days to verify the waste stopped"). However, there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop for the batch change if waste persists, so it matches anchor 4 (most checkpoints, minor validation gaps) rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single-file bundle under 50 lines with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories and no content that warrants external files; sections are well-organized (numbered steps plus a Rules section). Per the rubric's simple-skill exception, this earns the top score on well-organized sections alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |