Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete tool calls, clear sequencing, built-in validation/feedback loops, and disciplined evidence rules. The sole gap is the absence of example intermediate artifacts, which keeps actionability just short of perfect.
Suggestions
Add one short example of a provisional hypothesis and how it is confirmed/disconfirmed to make the abstract step 4 concrete.
Show a brief skeleton of what the final self-contained instructions handed to create_skill should look like.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and directive throughout—'Derive reusable instructions from the user's evidence. Do not decide their preferences in advance'—with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names concrete tools and conditions (search_classrooms/search_chats with empty query, page on hasMore, ask_user at least once, call create_skill with final content), but provides no example artifacts (e.g., what a provisional hypothesis looks like or sample saved-instruction content), leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (step 4 confirming/disconfirming examples, step 5 user correction) and a feedback loop (step 6 re-search on gaps), plus a hard termination rule in step 8; error recovery is built in. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single under-50-line SKILL.md with no external references needed, organized into well-labeled sections ('## Workflow', '## Evidence rules'); per the simple-skill note, this satisfies the 5-anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |