Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, confirmation-heavy SOP: the body is a lean router that sequences six phases with explicit validation gates and error feedback loops, delegating executable detail to real, well-organized reference files. The main improvable area is redundancy in the Core Rules section, where the server-side-config boundary and API-key-handling rules are each stated three to four times.
Suggestions
Consolidate the four Core Rules bullets about server-side model configuration ('Do not assume the OpenClaw agent's own model or API key...', 'OpenMAIC classroom generation uses... openmaic.yml...', 'must not rely on any request-time model or provider overrides', 'Only that server-side configuration may control...') into one or two bullets.
Merge the three API-key bullets ('Do not default to asking the user to paste API keys into chat', 'Prefer guiding the user to edit local config files themselves', 'Do not offer to write API keys into config files on the user's behalf') into a single rule.
In Phase 5, link to the specific section of generate-flow.md for the submission request shape (e.g. an anchor link like the one used for provider-keys.md#recognizing-configuration-errors) so the concrete request body is reachable in one hop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and rule-driven ('Move one phase at a time', 'Keep each step short and explicit'), but Core Rules contain redundancy: four bullets restate the server-side-config boundary ('Do not assume the OpenClaw agent's own model or API key...', 'uses OpenMAIC's server-side model configuration (openmaic.yml...)', 'must not rely on any request-time model or provider overrides', 'Only that server-side configuration may control...') and three bullets restate API-key handling. Matches anchor 4 (efficient with minor instances that could be trimmed), not anchor 5's every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable specifics: the exact config path '~/.openclaw/openclaw.json' with a JSON block, 'verify the service with GET {url}/api/health', 'Only send the supported fields (requirement, materialIds)', and step-by-step access-code retrieval (sign in at https://open.maic.chat, top-right corner, '访问码设置'). Mostly executable with minor gaps — clone/startup commands and request bodies are deferred to the phase references — so anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–5 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation gating ('Use this only after the service is healthy' via the health check), confirmation checkpoints before every state-changing action, and error feedback loops ('If generation later fails due to provider/model/auth issues, return to this phase'; 'a failed job may be retried; see the generate flow'). Matches anchor 5: clear sequence, explicit validation steps, and feedback loops for error recovery; above anchor 4, which allows missing checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A lean ~100-line overview where each phase loads exactly one clearly-signed reference ('Load [references/clone.md](references/clone.md)', etc.), all of which are verified real files; cross-links between references are lateral, and provider-keys.md's cited 'Optional Features' section exists. The extend branch's second hop (extend.md → extend-cookbook.md / extend-sdk.md) is an explicitly conditioned routing hub, not buried nesting, so navigation stays easy — anchor 5 rather than anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps'. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |