Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable body: concrete tool calls and paths, an explicit validated workflow, and clean deferral to sibling skills for deeper detail. Marginal gains remain in trimming rationale prose and possibly externalizing the decision table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, operational prose that assumes competence and never explains basic concepts; a few rationale passages ("Three properties make this safe to lean on") and the large decision table could be trimmed slightly, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact tool signatures (`duplicate_scene({ templateSceneId, targetOrder, title })`), exact patch paths (`/content/canvas/elements/N/content`), and a 12-row decision table mapping each need to a specific call — copy-paste ready and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step numbered sequence with explicit validation (the `detail:"text"` sweep in step 5 and the "Always run the text sweep" hard rule), feedback loops for residue repair, and a Hard rules checklist — validation is present so no destructive-cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single file with a "Where this sits" block that clearly signals one-level references to sibling skills ("Load it when..."); not a 5 because the bundle is monolithic with a dense inline table rather than split across referenced files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |