Conciseness

The body is dense imperative prose with zero concept explanation — it uses terms like 'PKCE', 'BYOK', and 'Start routes' without padding, and every line either instructs or constrains ('Inline the model id... Do not add a model const, a chat-model.ts...'). Lean and efficient, matching the 5 anchor; the 4 anchor's 'minor instances of over-explanation' are absent.

Actionability

It provides copy-paste commands ('pnpm nx g @tanstack/workspace-plugin:react-app <slug>', 'npx @tanstack/cli@latest create'), exact file paths, exact config keys ('"tab": "tutorial"', 'framework/react/examples/<slug>'), a literal sandbox comment, the GitHub URL pattern, the dependency line, and a finished reference example (examples/react/basic-chat). The single dynamic step (model id) correctly instructs reading the adapter's current model list rather than hardcoding a time-sensitive value.

Workflow Clarity

A clear phased sequence (shape app → file layout → tutorial page → nav and pointers → PRs) with an End-state checklist and a Common-mistakes error-recovery table. However, there is no explicit validation checkpoint such as building or running the example before the PR, matching the 4 anchor 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'; 5 would require an explicit validate-before-proceeding step.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single well-sectioned file with no bundle files, stays lean, and delegates at precisely the right moments — 'Load docs, simple-english, and i-have-adhd before writing tutorial pages' and 'Load pr-description before gh pr create' — well-signaled, one level deep. Navigation is easy via its headers and the End-state summary; nothing inlined belongs in a separate file.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('public teaching example or a docs tutorial') and a single action ('adding') but never states what the skill actually involves — app generation, tutorial writing, nav wiring, or PR creation. This matches the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'; not a 4 because no multi-action capability coverage is present, and not a 2 because the named actions are domain-specific rather than generic.

Completeness

The 'when' is explicit and unusually precise ('Use when adding a public teaching example or a docs tutorial', plus three negative cases), and a 'what' is present ('adding a public teaching example or a docs tutorial') but minimal — it names the deliverable without any scope of the work. Both what and when are answered with one side weaker, matching the 4 anchor; not 3 because the 'what' is explicitly stated, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural phrases a user would say — 'example', 'tutorial', 'docs tutorial', 'playground', 'API change', 'copy edit' — but omits common synonyms as positive triggers such as 'guide', 'walkthrough', or 'how-to'. Good coverage with a few natural terms missing fits the 4 anchor; 5 would require comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It actively disambiguates against the nearest neighbors — 'Don't use for an internal Nx playground (that is new-react-playground), for a package API change with no walkthrough, or for a docs-only copy edit' — establishing a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, matching the 5 anchor.