Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured, with executable commands and well-sourced mistake guidance. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop for the iterative dev-watch workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: code blocks carry brief, non-obvious comments and each mistake is a one-line rationale plus a source pointer, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable npx commands in copy-paste-ready Wrong/Correct blocks, covering the common cases (init, compile, dev, create --dev-watch, add) with concrete file-path sources. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup, core patterns, and a compile-before-apply checkpoint are sequenced clearly, and validation preconditions are documented via Common Mistakes, but there is no explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop for the dev-watch sync loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Setup, Core Patterns, and Common Mistakes with a single one-level cross-skill reference; no bundle files exist, and the content is self-contained, though it runs slightly long for a single file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |