Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary getting-started skill: fully executable setup code, dense v9-specific guidance with no padding, and a clean task-conditioned routing section to real bundle references. The only gap is the absence of an explicit render-verification checkpoint in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: no library intro or generic concept explanation, and every sentence carries v9-specific facts like "V9 takes only the host in its constructor; pass current options to controller.table(...) during every render", matching the lean-and-efficient 5 anchor with nothing to trim for the 4 anchor's minor over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The Setup block is a complete, copy-paste-ready Lit component with imports, decorators, repeat/FlexRender usage, and typed data, plus concrete API inspection paths ("Inspect node_modules/@tanstack/lit-table/dist/index.d.ts"), matching the fully-executable 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present ("Load intent load @tanstack/table-core#core first", keep one TableController, keep features/columns/data stable, then route to per-task references), but there is no explicit verification checkpoint such as confirming the rendered table, matching the 4 anchor's minor validation gaps rather than the 5 anchor's explicit validation steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The "Read for the task" section maps each condition to a well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/create-table-hook.md and references/with-tanstack-virtual.md, both verified to exist with matching content), plus sibling-skill routing, matching the clear-overview 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |