Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-structured migration reference with a clear sequenced procedure, validation checkpoints, and a failures section. The main weakness is that the large API-mapping tables are inlined rather than split into one-level-deep reference files.
Suggestions
Move the exhaustive pinning and shared-API rename tables into a separate reference file (e.g. references/api-mapping.md) referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validate-fix-retry loop ('if type-check fails, fix the flagged mappings and re-run') to make the feedback loop fully concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, reference-style content where nearly every line is a concrete v8->v9 mapping and no basic concepts are over-explained, but the exhaustive pinning table and repeated mapping tables make it long enough that minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable code snippets (useTable/tableFeatures, table.Subscribe) and concrete API mappings, though much of the guidance is tabular reference rather than copy-paste-ready end-to-end code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 10-step migration procedure with explicit type-check/test validation (steps 9-10), a final checkbox checklist, and a 'Common migration failures' section providing error-recovery guidance for a complex process. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with external references declared via frontmatter requires/sources and node_modules discovery pointers, but all content is inlined in a single 174-line file with no separate reference files for the large API tables. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |