Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, actionable tool manual with concrete commands, clear exit-code contracts, and well-signaled one-level references to real bundle files. Its main weaknesses are minor: a redundant inlined design-system table and a missing verification step in the custom-import workflow.
Suggestions
Replace or compress the 15-row 内置设计系统库 table with a pointer to design-systems/index.json (pick already lists systems), keeping only a short note on coverage.
Add a verification step to the 自定义设计系统 import workflow (e.g. '运行 design-full pick "<风格>" 确认新条目可被搜到').
Include a brief end-to-end example showing init → fill brief → pick → read the chosen design-system .md, so consumers see the full loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the only trimmable redundancy is the 15-row design-system table, which duplicates index.json that pick already outputs. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste commands with inputs/outputs/exit codes ('design-full init <任务名>', 'design-full pick "<风格描述>"'); minor gap is the absence of an example showing how to consume a picked design system. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear subcommand contract and a 3-step numbered import sequence, with exit codes (0/1) providing validation signals; the operations are idempotent/read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply, though the import step lacks a 'verify it appears in pick' checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good sectioning with one-level-deep references to real bundle files (scripts/, design-systems/*.md, index.json, workflows/); the only organization gap is the inlined 15-row table that could defer to index.json. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |