Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is exceptionally actionable — copy-paste commands, hard platform limits, and an explicit outcome-state machine for record keeping — with a clearly sequenced private-publish workflow and genuine validation checkpoints. Its weaknesses are organizational: repeated safety rules inflate token cost, and the absence of any section headers makes the dense material hard to navigate. Consolidating duplicated rules and adding headers would address both without losing operational detail.
Suggestions
Add section headers (e.g. ## 协作流程 / ## 预览与登录 / ## 视频与图集约束 / ## 提交结果与状态 / ## 失败与风控) so the dense content is scannable without reading every paragraph.
Consolidate the repeated receipt-preservation, no-resend, and publish-authorization rules into a single section to remove redundant tokens.
Consider moving the result.publication field semantics and state-combination meanings (accepted/id_resolved/resolution_pending/ownership_status) into a small reference file, keeping only the decision rules inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with zero conceptual padding and assumes Claude's competence, but several safety rules are stated two to three times (receipt preservation: "保留收据，不自行删除后重发" vs "不要删除收据换目录重发"; no-resend on failure; publish-authorization preconditions), so it could be meaningfully tightened — fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the minor-trim profile of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste commands cover both main branches (image: "kuaishou-publish publish --text @/绝对路径/body.txt --image ... --account default --confirm"; video: "--visibility private"), with hard limits (4 hashtags, 图集 1–31 张每张不超过 15MB), explicit flag constraints, and precise decision rules for outcome states ("published:true, recorded:false" → rerun same directory only to complete the record). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step sequence has explicit validation checkpoints (preview without --confirm before requesting login, confirm the private submission result, verify via kuaishou-engagement after the user publishes) and error-recovery rules for failures and ambiguous states, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply; it is not a 5 because critical workflow rules (forbidden-resend logic, state handling) are scattered across later unstructured paragraphs rather than sequenced with the main flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all content is appropriately inline for a ~50-line skill, but the body has no section headers — dense paragraphs covering distinct topics (workflow, media constraints, result semantics, error handling) are navigable only by full scanning, matching 'some structure but could be better organized' rather than the well-organized-sections bar for a 5. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |