Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete commands, a clear multi-step workflow, and useful pitfalls. It sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 due to placeholder values in one command and the lack of an explicit validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and efficient — tables, short bullets, and concise workflow steps — with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; the 适用场景 user-quote section is mildly redundant with the description but earns its place as trigger context. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands with real flags and example values (record-application.sh, update-status.sh) plus a clear delegation table, but update-status.sh still uses <rowid>/<new> placeholders rather than a fully worked example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 4-step workflow (问清 → 拆任务委派 → 时间线 → 状态跟踪) with a Pitfalls section serving as feedback guidance; no explicit validation checkpoint, but this is not a destructive/batch operation that mandates one. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections (适用场景, 常见申报类型, 工作流, 关系, Pitfalls, Notes) with clearly signaled one-level cross-skill references; no bundle files exist, so all content lives in one ~100-line file, which is appropriate but not split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |