Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise skill that effectively uses progressive disclosure to reference detailed materials. However, it lacks concrete code examples for detecting vulnerabilities and could benefit from explicit validation steps in the workflow. The duplicate '可用资源' section should be removed.
Suggestions
Add concrete code examples showing how to detect common vulnerabilities (e.g., regex patterns for innerHTML usage, dangerous URL patterns)
Include validation checkpoints in the workflow, such as 'verify all high-severity findings before generating report' or a severity classification step
Remove the duplicate '📦 可用资源' section at the end of the file
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, providing only essential information without explaining concepts Claude already knows (like what XSS or CSRF are). Every section serves a clear purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a checklist and workflow but lacks concrete code examples or specific commands. It references external files for detailed rules but doesn't include executable guidance in the main skill. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 3-step workflow is present but lacks validation checkpoints. For security auditing (a potentially high-stakes operation), there's no explicit verification step or feedback loop for handling discovered vulnerabilities. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear structure with well-signaled one-level-deep references to audit-rules.md, report-template.md, and security-checklist.md. The main skill serves as a concise overview pointing to detailed materials. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |