Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is well-organized and concise, with a clear 4-step workflow and appropriate use of external references. However, it lacks executable code examples and validation checkpoints, relying heavily on external files for implementation details. The duplicate '可用资源' section should be removed.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples or specific API call syntax in Step 1 instead of just naming the functions
Include validation/error handling guidance for API failures (e.g., what to do if stories_get returns empty or errors)
Remove the duplicate '📦 可用资源' section at the end
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations. Each section serves a clear purpose and assumes Claude understands the domain concepts. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides clear workflow steps and references specific API calls (stories_get, bugs_get, tasks_get), but lacks executable code examples. The actual implementation details are deferred to external files. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (1-4), but lacks validation checkpoints. No explicit error handling or feedback loops for API failures or data processing issues. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with clear overview and well-signaled one-level-deep references to mcp-calls.md, status-mapping.md, and summary-template.md. Content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |