Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-organized router for an architecture-navigation skill: clear scope/anti-scope sections, a problem-type routing map, and dense rules and pitfalls. Its main weaknesses are thin actionability (only document titles, no executable specifics) and reference paths that cannot be verified in the bundle plus duplicated reference listings.
Suggestions
Add one line per reference doc summarizing what it contains (key classes, entry points, or commands) so the routing decision is actionable before the doc is opened.
Remove the duplicate reference list in 延伸阅读 or the routing map in 快速指导 — keeping one clearly signaled navigation section would tighten the body.
Verify the reference paths (reference/1-runtime-upgrade.md etc.) exist in the skill bundle, or fix the directory name (reference/ vs references/) so the pointers resolve.
Add a fallback rule for problems that span both Agent and Worker (e.g., which doc to read first) to close the workflow gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — sections like 高信号规则 and 关键陷阱 deliver dense, non-obvious guidance with no padding about concepts Claude already knows. It falls short of anchor 5 because the three reference docs and the worker/dispatch handoffs are each stated twice (快速指导 steps 3–5 and again in 延伸阅读), a small redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | There is a concrete problem-type-to-document routing map ("Ask、心跳与任务拉起：reference/2-ask-heartbeat-build.md") and explicit handoff rules, but beyond document titles there is no executable detail — no commands, source paths, class names, or even a summary of what each reference covers. This matches anchor 3 ("some concrete guidance but incomplete") rather than anchor 4, which expects concrete code or commands with only minor gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 快速指导 gives a coherent numbered routing sequence (understand focus → responsibility split → route by problem type → handoff to sibling skills), which is clear for this non-destructive navigation task. It is below anchor 5 because there are no checkpoints for ambiguous cases (e.g., a problem spanning both Agent and Worker) and no guidance on what to do after opening a reference doc. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-structured overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references organized by problem type, matching anchor 4. It does not reach anchor 5 because the cited paths (reference/1-runtime-upgrade.md, reference/2-ask-heartbeat-build.md, reference/3-platform-ops.md) do not exist in the evaluated bundle, and the reference list is duplicated between 快速指导 and 延伸阅读. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |