Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized overview with clear applicable/non-applicable scoping and useful heuristics, but it offers only routing rather than executable instruction and its referenced detail files are missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete, runnable example (e.g. a permission-check call or group-membership query) so the guidance is executable rather than purely navigational.
Include a validation or verification checkpoint in 快速指导 (e.g. how to confirm a fix is an Auth-platform issue vs a business-side parameter issue) to strengthen the workflow.
Provide the referenced reference/*.md files in the bundle, or remove the broken links and inline the essential detail, so navigation resolves.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and efficient with well-scoped sections that assume the reader's competence; the reference list is duplicated between 快速指导 and 延伸阅读, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete decision and routing guidance (按问题类型进入对应参考文档, judgment of Auth vs business-side issues), but as an instruction-only skill it stops short of executable, copy-paste-ready commands or code patterns. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 快速指导 sequence with routing logic exists, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops for verifying the diagnosis; this is not a destructive/batch workflow so the hard cap does not apply. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well-organized with one-level references to reference/1-auth-foundation.md et al., but those referenced files are not present in the bundle, so the navigation points to nonexistent material. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |