Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and concise, but its guidance stays at the level of principles rather than executable steps — most notably it never explains how to actually perform service-ownership determination. Adding a concrete decision procedure would lift actionability and workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a concrete procedure or decision tree for '服务归属判断' — e.g. criteria/questions to determine which microservice a feature belongs to — instead of only saying to do it first.
Provide a short concrete example of the API/Service/DAO layering (e.g. where a sample feature's Resource, Service, and DAO live) so the layering rule is executable rather than abstract.
Insert an explicit validation/checklist step in '快速指导' (e.g. verify the feature does not cross service storage boundaries) to add a checkpoint to the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what BK-CI or Spring Boot is; minor redundancy between '快速指导' item 5 and the '延伸阅读' section keeps it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is largely abstract principles ('先做服务归属判断，再决定接口、服务和数据层放哪') with no concrete decision procedure, code, or specific steps for HOW to perform service-ownership determination or layering. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | '快速指导' provides a rough sequence (locate concern → ownership judgment → layering → inter-service API contracts → cross-link skills), but validation checkpoints are absent or only implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled cross-links to sibling skills under '延伸阅读'; the duplicated cross-references in '快速指导' are a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |