Content
48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, concise, and avoids redundant concept explanation, with clean sectioning and sensible cross-skill navigation. Its main weakness is actionability: it describes principles and pitfalls but gives no concrete code, commands, naming/API conventions, or executable steps, leaving workflow clarity low as well.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable guidance: example component structure, a Vuex module snippet, the project's API-call/error-handling pattern, and naming/indentation conventions so Claude can apply them directly.
Turn '快速指导' into an explicit sequenced workflow with checkpoints (e.g., identify data source → define interaction state → implement with consistent API pattern → handle empty/error/loading/permission states).
Flesh out '高信号规则' and '关键陷阱' with short code do/don't examples rather than abstract statements.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, sectioned, and avoids explaining generic Vue/Vuex concepts Claude already knows; a few "快速指导" items are slightly advisory/abstract and could be tightened, placing it just below the fully lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is high-level and abstract ("组件职责单一", "数据来源、交互状态、和谁通信", "错误态和 loading 态必须一起设计") with no concrete code, commands, naming patterns, file paths, or API-call conventions to actually execute — matching the minimal-concrete-guidance 2 anchor. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no real multi-step workflow sequence; the "快速指导" list is a rough ordering of principles with no validation checkpoints or defined sequence, and cross-skill handoffs are only vaguely signaled, fitting the 2 anchor. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-sectioned into clearly labeled categories (适用场景, 不适用场景, 高信号规则, 关键陷阱, 延伸阅读) with one-level-deep sibling-skill references (api-interface-design, backend-microservice-development); no bundle files exist so structure is purely internal, which is appropriate for this length, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |