Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean and well-structured with clear scope boundaries and cross-skill navigation, but its guidance is principle-level rather than concrete, and it lacks a true sequenced workflow with checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 concrete Go code/pattern snippets illustrating the highest-signal rules (e.g., a goroutine-with-context-cancellation and error-handling pattern) to lift actionability.
Convert '快速指导' into an explicit sequenced workflow for common Go Agent changes (locate lifecycle boundaries → add error/retry/cleanup → verify goroutine exit) with a validation/check step.
For destructive or batch Agent operations (e.g., process teardown, mass task retry), add an explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint so workflow clarity is not capped.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-style body with no concept padding or basic-programming explanation; every line is domain-specific guidance that assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names specific concerns to handle ('goroutine 生命周期', '重试、清理和并发边界') but stays at the principle/habit level without concrete code patterns or examples of how to apply them. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is well organized into scenarios/rules/pitfalls, but the numbered '快速指导' is a set of habits rather than a sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with clear section headers and clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers to peer skills (agent-module-architecture, dispatch-module-architecture), needing no bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |