Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized routing/habits skill whose structure and scope boundaries are clear, but whose guidance is principle-level rather than actionable: it tells Claude what to care about (goroutine lifecycle, error recovery, log quality) without any concrete Go patterns, examples, or verification steps to execute against.
Suggestions
Add concrete Go patterns for the named pitfalls — e.g., an errgroup/context-cancellation snippet showing goroutine exit paths, and error wrapping with %w plus structured log fields — so the guidance is executable rather than advisory.
Turn 快速指导 into a sequenced workflow with explicit checkpoints, e.g., 'before finishing a change, verify: every started goroutine has a shutdown path; every network call has retry/timeout; logs carry enough context to locate the failure'.
Remove redundancy by merging 快速指导 items 4–5 into the 延伸阅读 section and trimming 适用场景 items that restate the frontmatter description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every section is short. Minor redundancy keeps it below a 5: 适用场景 restates the frontmatter description, 快速指导 items 4–5 duplicate the 延伸阅读 section, and 高信号规则 partially overlaps 关键陷阱. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance stays at the level of high-level hints ("错误处理、日志、重试、清理和并发边界要先想清楚", "goroutine 启动容易，退出和异常恢复没管") with no concrete patterns, code, commands, or specific library usage for a coding skill. It is not entirely abstract (the link-out directives in items 4–5 are concrete actions), so it sits above a 1, but it is below a 3 because the core Go-side guidance lacks the specific steps to execute. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 快速指导 is a numbered 5-item list, giving a rough sequence (stability first, view lifecycles together, then check linked skills), but the items read as unordered advice rather than a sequenced workflow, and there are no validation checkpoints. No destructive/batch operations are involved, so no cap applies; it does not reach a 4's clear sequence with checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files, and nothing inlined belongs in a separate file — per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this qualifies for the top score. Sections are clearly headed (适用场景/不适用场景/快速指导/高信号规则/关键陷阱/延伸阅读), and the cross-references to agent-module-architecture and dispatch-module-architecture are one level deep and clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |