Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, actionable body with a sequenced workflow, executable commands, explicit validation, and a well-placed one-level reference. The only weakness is mild redundancy from the '实测生成流程记录' section repeating commands already shown elsewhere.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the '实测生成流程记录' section largely duplicates the ParseHeapDump.sh command and file listing already shown in '常用命令' and workflow step 2, adding tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance: concrete find/unzip commands, the inline Python HTML-extraction script, the full ParseHeapDump.sh invocation, and an rg command covering the common code-tracing cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 9-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints — exit-code and generated-artifact checks for MAT, a dedicated '验证' step, and the rule to mark insufficient evidence as '假设' rather than over-asserting. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to the real references/quartz-ramjobstore.md, gated on specific MAT class-name triggers; Quartz-specific detail is appropriately split out and navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |