Conciseness

Lean, signal-dense body with no concept padding, matching 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed'. Not 5 because the 快速指导 and 任务分流 sections redundantly restate OpenSpec/multi-Agent trigger conditions; not 3 because it is mostly efficient, not noticeably verbose.

Actionability

Provides concrete triage criteria (e.g. 新增或修改 API/数据结构 → OpenSpec; 跨 2 个以上微服务 → OpenSpec) and explicit Impact/Verification checklists, matching 'mostly executable guidance' for an instruction skill. Not 5 because some routing judgment is left to Claude rather than fully exhaustive; not 3 because guidance is concrete and fairly complete.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-step 快速指导 sequence with the Impact Checklist (pre-implementation) and Verification Checklist (post-implementation) as checkpoints, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. Not 5 because verification is a question list rather than an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop; not 3 because checkpoints are present and explicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections with a 延伸阅读 block of one-level-deep references (skill-context-first, openspec-first, multi-agent-workflow, ../../HARNESS.md), and the body correctly stays an overview ('只负责分流和清单，不承载模块知识'). Not 5 because references are backtick skill-names rather than navigable links and no bundle files exist to verify; not 3 because structure and references are clear.

Specificity

Names the domain (BK-CI AI 编码任务分流) and lists four concrete judgment actions — OpenSpec, 多 Agent, 影响面清单, 验证清单 — fitting the 'several specific actions' anchor. Not 5 because all actions are '判断是否需要 X' variants rather than distinct concrete operations; not 3 because four actions exceed the 1-2 anchor.

Completeness

Explicit 'what' (处理 BK-CI AI 编码任务分流) plus 'when' (处理…时使用，例如…) with concrete examples, satisfying both halves. Not 5 because the 'when' is not a maximally explicit separate 'Use when…' trigger-phrase list; not 3 because the 'when' is explicit with examples, not weakly implied (the missing-trigger cap does not apply).

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural domain terms users would say — OpenSpec, 多 Agent, 影响面清单, 验证清单, BK-CI, AI 编码 — matching 'good keyword coverage'. Not 5 because no synonym/extension variations are included; not 3 because coverage is solid rather than sparse.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (BK-CI task triage/routing) with distinct triggers, matching 'mostly distinct'. Not 5 because it deliberately overlaps with the skills it routes to (openspec-first, multi-agent-workflow); not 3 because the triage role is clearly scoped.