Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-sectioned overview that gives a sound mental model of the Store module's lifecycle focus and boundaries. Its main weaknesses are the missing bundle files behind every reference and the absence of concrete technical anchors, which leave the navigation instructions unexecutable as written.
Suggestions
Add the referenced files (e.g., references/1-store-foundation.md and references/2-release-install-extension.md) to the bundle, and align the path convention (the body uses `reference/` while the standard bundle directory is `references/`).
Include concrete anchors in the body or reference files — e.g., component state values and their transitions, key tables/services for release and install, and where extension points are registered — so guidance is executable without inferring details.
Make the handoff step explicit in 快速指导: state which sibling skill to switch to and under what condition (e.g., 'if the question is template-instance logic, switch to pipeline-template-module').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~46-line body is lean and every section ("适用场景", "不适用场景", "快速指导", "高信号规则", "关键陷阱") contributes non-obvious orientation information about the Store module. No padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is directional and specific in intent ("安装和升级问题要同时看来源组件版本与目标项目落地状态", "看 reference/1-store-foundation.md") but provides no concrete anchors such as state values, tables, or APIs, and the referenced files do not exist in the bundle so the "go read X" steps cannot actually be executed. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "快速指导" lays out a clear sequence (identify the mainline, read the matching reference, apply the store lifecycle mindset, hand off to the sibling skill) and no validation checkpoints are needed for a read-only reasoning skill. It falls short of 5 because the post-read step is only implied, not stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-structured with clearly-signaled, one-level references ("商店基础：reference/1-store-foundation.md", "发布与安装：reference/2-release-install-extension.md"), but scoring against the actual bundle shows neither referenced file exists and no references/ directory is present, so the disclosure path dangles and the structure is only partially realized. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |