Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized routing skill with concrete decision guidance and a clear sequence. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the body points to reference files that are not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add the referenced files (reference/1-store-foundation.md, reference/2-release-install-extension.md) to a references/ bundle, or remove the references and inline the essential content.
Reconcile the path: the body uses 'reference/' (singular) while the conventional bundle directory is 'references/' — pick one and make links resolve.
Add a short verification cue in 快速指导 (e.g. confirm the chosen reference exists before relying on it) to lift workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-structured Chinese prose with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (适用/不适用场景, 快速指导, 高信号规则, 关键陷阱) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete routing guidance — '先判断问题属于哪条主线' with explicit reference-file mapping and high-signal rules — but, as an instruction-only navigation skill, stops short of fully prescriptive executable steps; matches 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 快速指导 section lays out a clear sequenced decision process (identify the main line → read the matching reference → hand off to the relevant module skill); no explicit validation checkpoints, but this is a non-destructive routing skill so the destructive-cap rule does not apply, and it is not quite a 5 because checkpoints/error-handling are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well-signaled and intended as one-level-deep references, but the body cites reference/1-store-foundation.md and reference/2-release-install-extension.md while no references/ bundle directory exists — the referenced paths do not resolve, so navigation is broken; fits 'references present but not clearly signaled/verifiable'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |