Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized navigational overview with clear routing and boundaries, weakened by duplicate reference listings and reference files that are not present in the bundle. Tightening redundancy and ensuring referenced files exist would raise quality.
Suggestions
Add the referenced reference/1-runtime-flow.md, reference/2-task-plugin-log-artifact.md, and reference/3-env-api-debug.md to the bundle (or correct the paths) so the signaled navigation resolves to real files.
List the three reference documents once (in 延伸阅读) and have 快速指导 reference that section, removing the duplicated listing to save tokens.
Restructure the routing in 快速指导 as an explicit condition→action decision table (e.g., 'if lifecycle/主链路 → reference/1; if 插件执行/日志/制品 → reference/2') for crisper workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The overview is mostly lean with no over-explanation of known concepts, but the three reference docs are listed twice (快速指导 #3 and 延伸阅读) and the 执行器/非调度器 point is restated, which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Routing guidance is concrete — named reference files per problem type and explicit switch-to-skill rules — but the actual referenced files are absent from the bundle, limiting true executability of the navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 快速指导 gives a clear numbered decision sequence (identify problem type → route to reference → or switch skill); no validation checkpoints are needed for a non-destructive routing skill, though it reads as a list rather than a tight condition→action flow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references organized by problem type, but the referenced reference/*.md files do not exist in the bundle, so navigation points to files that cannot be verified. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |