Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content: every scenario is executable copy-paste TypeScript grounded in exact SDK shapes, and the routing/workflow structure is clear for an agent. The main cost is token efficiency — near-duplicate scope sections and repeated init boilerplate inflate the file — and the single-file layout forgoes reference-file splitting despite the body's length.
Suggestions
Collapse the near-duplicate scope guidance in "Activation Contract", "When to use this skill", and "Summary" into a single routing section to remove roughly 60 lines of redundancy.
State the SDK init pattern once (as the canonical shape) and strip the repeated import/init boilerplate from each of the nine scenario code blocks.
Move the scenario catalog or the full API reference into a bundled reference file (e.g. SCENARIOS.md) linked from SKILL.md, keeping the overview and routing in the main file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The scenario and API sections are dense and free of known-concept over-explanation, but scope guidance is triplicated across "Activation Contract", "When to use this skill", and "Summary", and the identical 4-line SDK init boilerplate repeats in all nine scenarios, so roughly a quarter of the file could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | All nine scenarios provide complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript with real SDK method calls and parameter shapes (e.g. auth.queryUserInfo({ platform: "PHONE", platformId: "+86 13800000000" })), plus concrete constraints like the customUserId length and allowed-character rules. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "How to use this skill" section gives a clear five-step agent workflow with explicit scenario routing and a fallback for unlisted APIs ("treat it as suspect and avoid using it"), but there are no explicit validate-then-retry checkpoints, keeping it below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized with clearly labeled scenario routing and clearly signaled sibling-skill references, but the ~435-line monolithic body keeps the full API list and nine-scenario catalog inline when a reference file split would aid progressive disclosure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |