Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured language router, but its core action depends on ts/skill.md and py/skill.md which are not present in the bundle, weakening actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced ts/skill.md and py/skill.md bundle files so the router's primary instruction (read the language-specific file) can actually be followed.
Tighten the redundant ⚠️ IMPORTANT block — it restates Step 2's "read the file before generating code" instruction and can be merged.
Add an explicit checkpoint confirming the language decision (and the TypeScript-default rule) before branching to the language-specific file, making the workflow validation-complete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean routing table plus two routing bullets with only minor redundancy (the ⚠️ block restates Step 2's instruction to read the file first); mostly assumes Claude's competence. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete routing signals and explicit "read ts/skill.md / py/skill.md" links are given, but those referenced files are absent from the bundle, so the executable target is missing in this environment. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear two-step sequence (determine language → read the matching skill file) with an unambiguous default-to-TypeScript rule; no destructive/batch ops so the validation cap does not apply, though a checkpoint for the default-enforcement is only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good and one-level-deep references are clearly signaled, but scoring against the actual bundle shows ts/skill.md and py/skill.md do not exist, so navigation is broken rather than well-placed. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |