Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Strong operational content: the workflows are unambiguous, validated, and recoverable, with exact tool-call syntax and error-code handling for both local and cloud channels, and references are real and well-signaled by task. The main weaknesses are token efficiency — repeated error-code explanations, duplicated reference listings, and conversational meta-commentary — and the cloud-mode detail that could live in a reference file.
Suggestions
Explain BUILD_OUTPUT_NOT_FOUND and DEPENDENCY_NOT_INSTALLED once (either in the Local workflow step or the Build & pipeline section) and cross-reference the other mention, cutting a duplicated paragraph.
Merge the Reference index into the Routing table (or drop the Routing table) so the three reference files are listed once, and delete the conversational 'So the answer to...' sentence in Build & pipeline execution, which restates the preceding bullets.
Move the detailed cloud-mode two-phase upload steps (function zip, CloudApp pipeline) into references/plan-and-apply.md, keeping only the channel-selection rules and a pointer in the body, which the body already cites for parameter details.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense, non-generic guidance, but contains several instances of redundancy: BUILD_OUTPUT_NOT_FOUND and DEPENDENCY_NOT_INSTALLED are each explained twice (Local workflow step 2 and Build & pipeline execution), the three reference files are listed twice (Routing table plus Reference index), and 'So the answer to "can cloud mode run local CLI commands" is: execution authority is moved...' restates the preceding bullets. This fits the 3 anchor (mostly efficient but could be tightened) rather than 4 because the repetition is systematic, not a single trimmable passage. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready for MCP tool calls: 'deployBuild({ cwd, mode? })', 'deployApply with confirm=true (plus yes / concurrency / continueOnError)', and the cloud two-phase flows spell out exact action names and parameter keys ('manageFunctions(action=createFunction|updateFunctionCode, code={cosBucketName, cosObjectName, cosBucketRegion?})') with error codes and recovery paths. Both the local and cloud common cases are covered specifically, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The local workflow is a clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation for a destructive operation: dry-run plan with per-resource action classification, 'If any entry is conflict, stop and resolve it before applying', the Deployment Gate declaration before apply, a feedback loop ('fails with BUILD_OUTPUT_NOT_FOUND and directs you back to this step — call deployBuild first, then retry'), and a Minimum self-check checklist. This matches the 5 anchor including error-recovery loops and a checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A Routing table maps user tasks to the three real, one-level-deep reference files (config-schema.md, plan-and-apply.md, multi-env.md, all verified present), and an index repeats them with links. However, the ~55-line cloud-mode upload pipeline and the Build & pipeline execution details are inlined in the body where a reference split would fit better, which is the minor organization gap of the 4 anchor rather than the clean overview split of the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |