Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with good progressive disclosure, but it is held back by duplicated OpenAPI content and a workflow that lacks explicit validation/verification checkpoints for API calls.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the searchKnowledgeBase/OpenAPI API-name list — keep it in one place and reference it from the other to remove redundant padding.
Add at least one complete executable HTTP request example (base URL + endpoint path + auth header + expected response) so guidance is fully copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint to the workflow, e.g. 'Confirm the endpoint and parameters against the returned swagger before calling, and check the response status/error code.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient prose, but the searchKnowledgeBase/OpenAPI API-name list is duplicated nearly verbatim (in 'How to use' and again under 'OpenAPI Swagger Documentation'), and the :::warning block over-explains basic token substitution. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance (exact URL templates, exact searchKnowledgeBase tool-call syntax, the Authorization header), but never shows a complete end-to-end HTTP request example covering a common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence exists (clarify → base URL → auth → OpenAPI), but validation checkpoints and error-recovery loops are implicit or absent; 'Never invent endpoints' is a guardrail, not a verification step. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with clear section headers and a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/extended-guide.md, which exists) for detailed scenarios, with a reference index at the end. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |