Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong instruction-only skill body: a clearly sequenced planning workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, a concrete skill-routing table, and exemplary one-level-deep progressive disclosure into three purpose-scoped reference files. The main costs are the off-topic telemetry reporting block consuming token budget and a few steps that direct rather than specify exact commands.
Suggestions
Move the skillpack activation-reporting details (payload spec, identity resolution order, curl/PowerShell examples) into a reference file and keep only a one-line instruction in SKILL.md to reclaim ~25 lines of token budget.
Add the concrete commands for the context-establishment checks (e.g., the git worktree-root and path-limited status invocations) so 'Record the actual Git root and distinguish whole-worktree status' is directly executable.
Show a minimal filled-in example of the final handoff instruction (with realistic artifact paths) so executors can see the expected shape, not just the template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core workflow is dense and assumes Claude's competence (e.g., 'Empty status output does not establish that ignored or untracked input files match a commit'), but the ~28-line skillpack telemetry block (UUID generation, curl/PowerShell examples, identity resolution order) is unrelated to the skill's task and could live in a reference file. Fits anchor 4: efficient with a trimmable section; not 5 because that block's tokens do not serve the planning task. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance dominates: exact paths ('docs/agents/plan-pr.md', 'plans/plan-pr/runs/<timestamp>-<topic>/plan.md'), a trigger/skill/phase routing table, and a fill-in executable handoff instruction. Some steps remain directional rather than procedural ('Inspect actual implementation, callers, contracts, tests and CI', 'Record the actual Git root') without the specific commands, which keeps it below fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5; well above anchor 3 since no pseudocode or missing key details. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-phase sequence (Establish context → Route expertise → Design → Challenge → Deliver/approval → Execute handoff) with explicit validation checkpoints: a numbered 4-item self-review checklist ('Efficacy / Grounding / Coverage / Simplicity'), the approval gate ('Do not start implementation on silence'), error-recovery loops ('Correct material findings once and recheck changed concerns'), and resume revalidation. Matches the top anchor's sequence + validation + feedback loops + checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview and conditional detail is correctly split into three real, one-level-deep references, each invoked at a specific decision point: 'read references/setup.md' (only when setup is requested), 'read references/ticket-intake.md' (issue ID/URL), 'Read references/plan-contract.md' (before saving the plan). All three files exist with substantive content; navigation is easy with no nesting. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |