CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competitor-alternatives

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Well-organized and structurally concrete, with good progressive disclosure via two genuine reference files. It loses points for verbosity in principle sections, for giving structural templates rather than ready-to-use output examples, and for lacking validation checkpoints in what is effectively a batch page-production workflow.

Suggestions

Tighten 'Core Principles' and section rationale prose to remove marketing common sense Claude already knows (e.g., 'Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims').

Add one complete, copy-paste-ready example page (or point to a concrete template in references/templates.md) so the skill produces executable output rather than outlines.

Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint after page generation (e.g., review against competitor data, check internal links and schema) to support the batch page-production workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts, but sections like 'Core Principles' ('Acknowledge competitor strengths', 'Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims') and the verbose format/page-structure lists restate marketing common sense Claude already knows, so it could be tightened without losing value.

2 / 3

Actionability

Guidance is concrete in structure (URL patterns, target keywords, numbered page sections, a keyword table) but provides templates only by reference and no fully copy-paste-ready example output, leaving the actual page copy to be inferred rather than executable.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A sequence is present (Initial Assessment -> research -> format selection -> output), and the research process is numbered, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, and producing a page set is effectively a batch operation that would benefit from a verify step.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clear overview that points one level deep to two real, well-signaled references ([references/templates.md] and [references/content-architecture.md]), both of which exist as files; content is appropriately split and navigation is easy.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that is specific, well-triggered, and distinctive. It clearly states both what the skill produces and the natural phrases that should activate it, covering multiple page formats. Minor: it is somewhat long and the closing 'Emphasizes deep research...' clause is soft guidance rather than a trigger, but it does not detract from the score.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a concrete deliverable (competitor comparison/alternative pages) and enumerates four specific formats ('singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor'), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what (create competitor comparison/alternative pages) and when ('When the user wants to...' plus 'Also use when the user mentions...'), satisfying both the what and the when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes many natural user phrases ('alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages') giving good coverage of terms users would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (SEO/sales-enablement competitor pages) with distinct, format-specific triggers unlikely to collide with general copywriting or SEO skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
TheCraigHewitt/seomachine
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.