Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured advisory skill body that is concise, actionable, and logically sequenced, with experiment detail correctly offloaded to a one-level reference. It is advisory rather than procedural, so it lacks executable code and validation loops, but the rubric's instruction-only accommodation covers that.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with tables, bullets, and short statements that assume Claude's competence; minor instances of generic CRO aphorisms ('Time-to-Value Is Everything', 'Do, Don't Show') that could be trimmed but overall efficient. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — approach comparison tables with Best-For/Risk, checklist best practices ('3-7 items', 'Order by value'), specific email triggers (24h, 72h, days 3/7/14), and a defined output format; minor gaps in fully prescriptive steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Logical sequence from Initial Assessment → Defining Activation → Flow Design → Multi-Channel → Stalled Users → Measurement → Output Format; no validation checkpoints, but none are required for an advisory (non-destructive, non-batch) skill, so it stays above the level-3 cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview body with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference to references/experiments.md (a real file), with experiment detail appropriately split out and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |