Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, concise body with a well-sequenced, validated workflow; the only real gap is that the four linked reference files are named but not actually bundled.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (README.md, WEB_APPS.md, RECORDING.md, TESTS.md) under references/ so the Linked References section resolves to real content.
If any referenced file is not yet ready, either remove its entry or mark it as forthcoming so Claude does not chase a dead link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense with concrete tool calls and parameters, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining what Computer Use or GUI automation is — every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives fully concrete, executable tool invocations with exact arguments (e.g. get_window_state({ pid, window_id }), click({ pid, window_id, x, y }), zoom({ pid, window_id, x1, y1, x2, y2 })), making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Required Loop' and 'Sparse UI Fallback' are clearly sequenced with explicit snapshot-before/after checkpoints, visible-evidence verification, and error signals ('Repeated zoom calls are a failure signal'), providing strong feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A dedicated 'Linked References' section signals four one-level-deep files (README.md, WEB_APPS.md, RECORDING.md, TESTS.md) with short descriptions, but none of these files exist in the references/scripts/assets bundle, so the navigation leads nowhere and cannot earn a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |