Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable process skill with a clear sequenced workflow and concrete commands/paths. Minor redundancy across sections and an implicit rather than explicit validation retry loop keep it just short of top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean for a process skill and assumes Claude's intelligence (no boilerplate about RFCs or Vue), but the tasks.md prohibition and GitHub issue eligibility rules are each restated across sections and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance throughout: exact folder taxonomy, file names (spec.md/plan.md), labels ([feature]/[bug]), the Closes #NNN PR pattern, and copy-paste commands (pnpm run format/i18n/lint/typecheck). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 13-step sequenced workflow with review and quality-gate checkpoints, but the validate->fix->retry feedback loop is implied rather than stated explicitly for the step-13 checks. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a single one-level reference to the deepchat-sdd-cleanup skill and no nested references; the GitHub Issue Sync section is sizable enough it could arguably live in its own reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |