Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured single-purpose protocol with concrete caps, an explicit fallback marker, and clear termination guidance; its only weakness is that, being instruction-only, it lacks copy-paste executable examples for the common search-and-cite path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: it assumes Claude's competence, gives no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line (Inputs, Protocol, Rules, Output) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance dominates (exact sub-question counts, 'at most one search query per sub-question', ~300-500 word target, '[n] Title — URL' format, RESEARCH_THIN marker), but it is instruction-only with no code/commands, leaving minor gaps for the most common execution paths. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-step sequence with explicit caps and a defined fallback (RESEARCH_THIN when the round returns nothing usable), plus a 'Return as soon as the brief is written' termination checkpoint; minor validation gap is that the single-round/no-iteration constraint doubles as the only checkpoint rather than an explicit verify step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized sections (Inputs, Protocol, Rules, Output) and no nested references; for a sub-50-line skill needing no external bundle files, this is appropriately structured and trivially navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |