Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured overview that explains the meta-skill's design and gives a concrete fallback. The main gap is actionability: the body lacks executable commands or examples because the real mechanics are embedded in frontmatter rather than the markdown body.
Suggestions
Add a short 'Re-run a failed render' example showing the concrete sub-agent invocation (input → scan output, output → file path) so the fallback is copy-paste actionable.
Add an explicit validation step before compose_doc (e.g. 'Confirm both .puml and .drawio files exist and are non-empty before composing') to lift workflow clarity above the reactive fallback.
Surface 1-2 representative composition-step outputs inline (e.g. the classify_kind choices) so the body is self-contained without re-reading the frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it does not explain what PlantUML or draw.io are, and the one rationale clause ('running in parallel because they are independent tools serving different downstream uses') earns its place by justifying the design. Re-reading the 4-anchor (minor over-explanation that could be trimmed) it fits the 5-anchor better — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The fallback gives a concrete instruction ('manually re-run the failed render via sub-agent with the same scan output as input') and the trigger instruction is specific, but there is no executable code or command in the body — the mechanics live in the frontmatter composition block. This sits between the pseudocode/incomplete anchor (3) and the mostly-executable anchor (4), and the absence of copy-paste steps keeps it at 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The scan → classify → parallel render → compose sequence is clear, and the Fallback section provides an explicit error-recovery feedback loop. It is not a 5 because there is no validation checkpoint that verifies render outputs (e.g. PlantUML parse, well-formed draw.io XML) before composition — only a reactive fallback after failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (<50 line) skill with no external references needed; it is well-organized into clear sections (intro, Trigger surface, Fallback), so the simple-skill exception applies and well-organized sections score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |